Many architects and firms were born out of time-honored traditional creative processes and this new generation of technology has the potential to create an exciting amalgamation of traditional and modern workflows. Some firms have been open to change, others have resisted, yet it’s clear that AI has permeated the architectural domain and promises to unlock innovation and revolutionize the way we approach designing for the built environment.
For architects, technical adaptability is not a novel concept because we’re constantly adapting our workflows and processes to meet modern society's demands and address global challenges. Specifically, this article seeks to analyze the complex history of the architectural process and speculate on what the future of AI could be. The industry is continuously shifting, and as technology continues to evolve, designers will need to adapt their workflows to stay at the forefront of the profession.
Change is Not a Novel Concept
Before we look forward, let’s examine the reasons for pockets of resistance within the profession to embrace this changing technology. Foremost is that architects have well-established workflows that have been refined, improved, and directly curated through years of learned successes and failures. A changing architectural landscape instinctively leads one to react, and the fear of the unknown creates an aversion to change.
At first, AI technologies can be perceived as complex and unfamiliar, creating feelings of worrying anxiety related to a mixture of lack of creative control, fear of client acceptance, and fear even of perceived job security. Let’s think back to the digital revolution, where architects moved from pen and paper to computer drafting - architects were resistant to change for similar reasons. We feared a loss of artistic expression; feared we would depend too heavily on technology to succeed and were of course concerned with the impacts it would have on traditional design processes. Yet, as CAD became more advanced, more widely known, and easier to use, the benefits of using such a system began to outweigh the perceived doubts. Drafting became more efficient, precise, and revisable, and collaboration within teams greatly improved. Today, it’s an integral part of successful architectural practice and has allowed designers to create innovative and complex designs with more accuracy and efficiency than ever before.
So why then, are we so hesitant to adopt new technology like AI?
Embracing Technology to Sharpen Skillsets
Like with all things, change takes time. Ethical dilemmas coupled with steep learning curves and challenges to established workflows nurture seeds of fear and doubt in many practices. There is the fear that maybe this whole thing is just a fad. Remember when parametric architecture was the buzzword of the future? It promised an inherently iterative design process, the creation of complex geometry, and was infinitely flexible and adaptable. That said, its application was challenging, and many architects moved towards more intuitive design methods. AI feels like the next generation of parametric design but with more applicability.
While parametric design and AI are two distinct concepts, they complement each other in a variety of ways. Parametric design uses algorithms and computational tools to generate and manipulate complex forms, while AI refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines that can analyze and learn from data to make informed decisions. Parametric design offers high flexibility and adaptability while AI can make suggestions based on trends as its flexibility is limited to the data it has been trained on. For human involvement, parametric design relies heavily on human creativity, expertise, and input to manipulate and explore the parametric model. AI on the other hand can work independently to generate design solutions or provide design insights but it still requires human guidance and validation to ensure results. Finally, while parametric design is a valuable tool for creating innovative architectural expressions, AI has a broader scope that can be applied across various aspects of architecture. Think data analysis, energy modeling, material optimization, and design conceptualization.
While there are similarities in both tools, AI has a broader reach, and the fact that it’s autonomous or semi-autonomous potentially adds many layers of support over something like parametric design. There are already dozens of AI tools focused on architecture. Large language models like ChatGPT and Bloom allow architects to communicate more effectively and in multiple languages. Image generative tools like Midjourney and Dall-E 2 encourage designers to think outside of the box and allow them to quickly iterate through potential conceptual design options. More focused tools like Veras directly integrate into an architect’s existing 3D toolbox i.e., Revit, Sketchup, and Rhino to conceptualize masses with existing context. Exploring each of these involves a deeper dive into what they are currently used for, how they can be applicable to our workflow, and how they can improve our design thinking and process.
Like with anything else, using these tools requires some level of honing skillsets. Acquiring useful images from Midjourney and Dall-E requires knowledge of prompt structure to get useful results. The same goes for Veras, where prompt design has a large impact on the result. ChatGPT is more forgiving in that sense since it’s designed to respond conversationally, however, as is often the case, it comes with drawbacks and caveats. One of which is telling lies with confidence. It has no way to confirm what it’s saying is true, and so in that vein, it requires constant checking and validation through trusted outside sources.
The Ethical AI Dilemma of Human Intuition
While AI presents an obvious array of benefits, designers must also cautiously approach its adoption with a clear understanding of the potential pitfalls. Ethical complexities, maintaining the human touch, clear decision-making processes, cultural nuances, and even maintaining human-centric design principles, to name a few.
Since the designs that are born from AI are in a sense “co-created,” we’ll need to have a groundwork in place to deal with attribution of authorship to ensure fair protection of intellectual property. Designers will also need to learn to harness AI without sacrificing the artistic authenticity that distinguishes their work from others in the first place. Our craft is quintessentially human, meaning the idea of losing touch with that side of the design and diving headfirst into a non-human (AI) generated approach could prove disastrous. Imagine designs that are created where they no longer reflect local aesthetics, traditions, or social dynamics. These anti-human approaches require someone with empathy and human values to maintain clear boundaries. As complex as the path forward will be, it is very much a part of traditional architectural principles for transforming the built environment to ensure the profession moves forward with ethical integrity and sustainability.We have utilized various AI tools like ChatGPT, Midjourney, Dall-E, and Veras in our design work for clients; ChatGPT has been used for brainstorming, concept description, precedent-building analysis, and generating statements. Midjourney and Dall-E were employed for creating conceptual images and brainstorming architectural ideas. Veras helped with materiality, lighting, and visualizing building styles. These tools work in tandem to expedite aspects of our design process, allowing us to focus on the finer details and project efficiency.
AI tools are increasingly finding their way into architect’s workflows and revolutionizing the design process. Their integration is emerging as a transformative force that promises to reshape the very foundations of design. Designers are no longer confined to the traditional modes of creation and are instead empowered by AI-driven tools like generative models and language processing which offer a range of benefits and challenges for designers and their teams.
AI can act as a collaborator, and enabler, and amplify innovative ideas, co-creating designs that balance aesthetic and functional pragmatism. It can automate repetitive tasks, generate design alternatives, and analyze complex data which encourages architects to make data-driven decisions. Of course, the journey is not without challenges and ethical considerations as designers grapple with ownership, authenticity, and preservation of the human touch.
However, as we continue to advance, the digital/pixel and physical/mortar worlds will continue to converge as the symbiotic relationship between artificial intelligence and designers flourishes and evolves, enabling us to utilize its full potential to advance our collective profession.